The first day of school is approaching, and teachers are
busy getting their rooms ready, creating their class pages, lesson plans, and
flip charts, and trying to anticipate what their year will be like. We recently received our schedules in the
mail with our welcome back letter.
Teacher schedules have changed dramatically since my first year of
teaching.
In 1990, our school followed a “Middle School Concept.” This involved having teachers work in teams –
all with the same students. The idea was
that teachers could help each other do their best for each student, and work
together to resolve academic or behavior problems. Our daily schedule included a 40 minute prep
period, during which we completed lesson plans and paperwork, made copies,
contacted parents, graded papers, and handled endless other details necessary
to the job.
Our schedule also included, however, a 40 minute common
planning period. During this time each
day, all five academic teachers would meet to plan together, discuss individual
students, come up with ideas for interdisciplinary activities, brainstorm ideas
for motivating students and dealing with those academic and behavioral
problems, mentor new teachers, conduct student/teacher conferences, and meet
with administration. We kept notes of
each meeting, and discussed our biggest concerns with our principal or
assistant principal at least once a week. This allowed teachers to have a voice, and
communicate concerns to an administrator.
Unfortunately, common planning periods and our adherence to
a “middle school concept” have been eliminated.
You may say, “Haven’t common planning periods recently been
replaced by PLC’s?” Yes, except that
teachers must squeeze in a PLC during their own “free” time, of which there
really is none, and teachers within a PLC often have different schedules. Teacher teams for PLC’s are sometimes rather
random, and there are no administrators at PLC meetings, except on rare
occasions.
I must admit that with recent changes in the
responsibilities of administrators, their ability to take the time to
communicate with teachers is limited.
Suggestion #1:
Unless teachers are provided with
meaningful time to work together, PLC’s will be of little benefit, and until
administrators provide a means for upward communication, they will be unaware
of the actual issues teachers face within their classrooms every day. Every school should provide time for
collaboration with colleagues and communication with administration.